Fire Emblem Wiki talk:Coverage policy

TearRing Saga/Berwick Saga

Does anyone have any opinions on whether or not we should include these games? It briefly came up here, but didn't generate enough discussion to go on. Notably, other Fire Emblem sites like Serenes Forest and the Fire Emblem Wikia cover them, owing to their connections to FE, so I feel it's worth discussing at the least. --Moydow (Support) 02:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

I have no issues with covering TRS and Berwick. I've played and am pretty familiar with TRS. Not so much Berwick, though, that'll change when the English translation is finished. Both should probably pretty low priority for now though. (...That is probably obvious) -L95 (talk) 03:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
I think these games fall within the scope of interest surrounding FE, as would the upcoming Vestaria Saga. It wouldn't be out of place to have at least some coverage of the games here, but as L95 said, it should take a backseat to pretty much everything else. Then again, if an editor feels compelled to work on them, I don't see why they should be stopped. BrandedOne (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
We've decided to go ahead with this, putting all the TRS content into a separate namespace to denote it as separate from FE content. --Moydow (Support) 01:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC)

I would suggest adding Vestaria Saga, probably as part of the TRS name space. PikaSamus (talk) 00:05, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

No objections here. At least this one is getting an official English release, so it should hopefully be easier to cover. --Moydow (Support) 00:13, 18 September 2017 (UTC)
Return to the project page "Coverage policy".