Anonymous

Site News
Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk!

Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on X (Twitter) or Tumblr!

User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.
m
m (...Since this "warning" was originally on this page...)
Line 223: Line 223:
:::Sorry, that response back then was a bit of a knee-jerk reaction to having had my rhythm disrupted.  Encountering multiple different formats for a single method of delivery can get confusing; it was bad enough when there were variations of the more widely-used method that both included and excluded epithets (and one unification was a tough enough task).  I had hoped that I wouldn't have gotten an inquiry about that comment, I was hoping things would just simply blow over and the normal flow would not have been disrupted, but you just had to persist and turn it into a controversy I had hoped to avoid (I hope you'll consider the issue resolved)...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] ([[User talk:Shiningpikablu252|talk]]) 05:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)
:::Sorry, that response back then was a bit of a knee-jerk reaction to having had my rhythm disrupted.  Encountering multiple different formats for a single method of delivery can get confusing; it was bad enough when there were variations of the more widely-used method that both included and excluded epithets (and one unification was a tough enough task).  I had hoped that I wouldn't have gotten an inquiry about that comment, I was hoping things would just simply blow over and the normal flow would not have been disrupted, but you just had to persist and turn it into a controversy I had hoped to avoid (I hope you'll consider the issue resolved)...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] ([[User talk:Shiningpikablu252|talk]]) 05:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC)


== (Misguided) Warning ==
== Warning ==
Working on a wiki is supposed to be a collaborative effort. And yet you are refusing to even acknowledge another user trying to reach out to you after you voiced your concerns about how a particular template is set up. If you think the template isn't the best way to display the information, why would you not explain why you feel that way? Other users will have different opinions on how pages should be set up; refusing to work with them to find the best solution is not the sort of behaviour we want here.
Working on a wiki is supposed to be a collaborative effort. And yet you are refusing to even acknowledge another user trying to reach out to you after you voiced your concerns about how a particular template is set up. If you think the template isn't the best way to display the information, why would you not explain why you feel that way? Other users will have different opinions on how pages should be set up; refusing to work with them to find the best solution is not the sort of behaviour we want here.


28,015

edits