Anonymous

Site News
Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk!

Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on Twitter (X) or Tumblr!

Fire Emblem Wiki talk:Coverage policy: Difference between revisions

From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.
m
mNo edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
::I think these games fall within the scope of interest surrounding FE, as would the upcoming Vestaria Saga. It wouldn't be out of place to have at least some coverage of the games here, but as L95 said, it should take a backseat to pretty much everything else. Then again, if an editor feels compelled to work on them, I don't see why they should be stopped. [[User:BrandedOne|BrandedOne]] ([[User talk:BrandedOne|talk]]) 01:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
::I think these games fall within the scope of interest surrounding FE, as would the upcoming Vestaria Saga. It wouldn't be out of place to have at least some coverage of the games here, but as L95 said, it should take a backseat to pretty much everything else. Then again, if an editor feels compelled to work on them, I don't see why they should be stopped. [[User:BrandedOne|BrandedOne]] ([[User talk:BrandedOne|talk]]) 01:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


:We've decided to go ahead with this, putting all the TRS content into a separate namespace to denote it as separate from FE content.
:We've decided to go ahead with this, putting all the TRS content into a separate namespace to denote it as separate from FE content. --[[User:Moydow|<span style="color: green;">Moy</span><span style="color: orange;">dow</span>]] ([[User talk:Moydow|Support]]) 01:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
28,015

edits