Site News
Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk!

Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on Twitter (X) or Tumblr!

Cross-Wiki Week 2023: From September 23 to October 1, make contributions to NIWA wikis and participating affiliates that you normally don't edit for a chance to win a Nintendo eShop gift card! See here for more details.

Talk:Fiend

From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.

Majin, Gold, Kelbeth, Belreth, and Badess appear to be the units' names rather than classes

See here. Like other generic units, their class is written as "---" on their stats screen, though, so it could easily be mistaken for being a class. PikaSamus (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Okay, Lich, Balrog, and White Dragon are also just unit names. PikaSamus (talk) 23:45, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
I saw that a while back as well and I considered bringing it up here, but I honestly wasn't sure what to make of it. Considering their identical stats it makes sense to get rid of them and merge back into the main pages for each classes, but at the same time I'm still confused as to what these names were even meant to be, considering how most of these appear multiple times and how rare unique enemy names are in FE2 in general. On the other hand, being a unit name actually makes "majin" make sense. --PA (talk) 00:35, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Hold on a second, I doublechecked and it looks like a few of these cases (wight, deathgoyle, gold, bahdess, kelves, and belrez) actually do have variations in their base stats compared to the original classes (mostly in HP). I don't think this would be possible if they weren't individual classes (although I don't know much about how FE2's innards work), so it's possible that despite this oddity they actually are stored as separate classes. Someone will have to look into this. --PA (talk) 00:41, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
This isn't deciding proof in any way, but I feel it would be relevant to point out that Pegasus Knight (a Japanese fansite/wiki) lists Badess, etc, as their own classes. http://www.pegasusknight.com/mb/fe2/cd_param.html L95 (talk) 19:42, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

FE15 seems to have complicated this, so I have removed the merge notice template. PikaSamus (talk) 02:55, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

I believe many classes in the original shared data as a way to save stats. I've also heard its hard to make unplayable classes in Gaiden playable with hacking due to this. Emperor Hardin (talk) 03:09, 5 April 2017 (UTC)