4,676
edits
| Site News |
|---|
| Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk! Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on X (Twitter) or Tumblr! |
User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.
User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 1 (view source)
Revision as of 20:37, 1 December 2018
, 1 December 2018→Stop overreacting
Fastesthe1 (talk | contribs) (→About Warriors Forts...: new section) |
Master Snake (talk | contribs) |
||
| (14 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 201: | Line 201: | ||
* The forts come in three colors: blue for you, red for the main enemy, and yellow if there is a second enemy team (they will fight against both you and red). Green ally forts just don't exist. | * The forts come in three colors: blue for you, red for the main enemy, and yellow if there is a second enemy team (they will fight against both you and red). Green ally forts just don't exist. | ||
Once again, thanks for making this! [[User:Fastesthe1|Fastesthe1]] ([[User talk:Fastesthe1|talk]]) 04:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC) | Once again, thanks for making this! [[User:Fastesthe1|Fastesthe1]] ([[User talk:Fastesthe1|talk]]) 04:49, 20 September 2018 (UTC) | ||
:More than welcome. ...And to think it nearly went into formal action supporting ''twenty'' forts right off the bat! --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] ([[User talk:Shiningpikablu252|talk]]) 05:06, 20 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Stop overreacting == | |||
With that type of attitude, you make it an unpleasant place for others to freely contribute to the site. You need to get a firm grip that I'm not perfect and '''will make mistakes'''. You reacted almost the same way on Shade's page. Change your attitude. [[File:Ma 3ds02 malig knight camilla enemy.gif|link= User: Master Snake]] [[User:Master Snake|Master Snake]] 04:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
:Sorry, but I tend to get ticked off whenever anybody puts down something that they really should know better on or doesn't do the research (the fact that Loki's special tree was initially missing completely made it look like it was done by somebody who wasn't even looking at the reveal trailer or a source that had watched it and got relayed the information by audio alone, and anyone who's done the research knows that [[Assault]] has never been innate)--basically, putting me on clean-up duty. I'm not opposed to somebody else giving things a shot, but they should really fully know what they're going for before they hit submit...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] ([[User talk:Shiningpikablu252|talk]]) 04:50, 22 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
::You have made mistakes before too. Remember that everyone here is human, and humans make mistakes. You have, for instance, claimed that whether certain weapons in ''Heroes'' target def or res is based off of the ''user's'' defensive stats and not the enemy's ([https://fireemblemwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Felicia%27s%20Plate&diff=prev&oldid=160473][https://fireemblemwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Great_Flame&diff=155321&oldid=155317]), or that Fjorm has Aegis instead of Sacred Cowl ([https://fireemblemwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Fjorm&diff=prev&oldid=158461]). Getting pissed off and complaining in edit summaries solves nothing, but it does make you look rude. | |||
::I have a question I would like to ask you that is not really related to this, and this will be in the next section heading. [[User:PikaSamus|PikaSamus]] ([[User talk:PikaSamus|talk]]) 20:25, 22 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
==Heroes passive skill rarity templates== | |||
What is it [https://fireemblemwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Wrath&curid=8044&diff=213724&oldid=204918 that you do you not like] about those templates? You didn't say anything about it other than ask who made it (which would be me), call it confusing, and say that you want it dismantled. I am not sure exactly what you find confusing about it other than it being a template with which you have not familiarized yourself (it is one of a bunch of things that I started but did not finish). | |||
It is more informative then just listing every character and just saying "rarity requirements vary per character". On ''Awakening'' and ''Fates'' skill articles, we list the level that the class gets the skills, and on ''Gaiden'' magic pages we list the levels they get them. Having that message to avoid listing them forces people to view another page to get that information, which is not a good idea in my opinion. In fact this could be an opportunity to put [[User:Moydow/Heroes skills by rarity|this page]] to use as a resource. | |||
I would like to know what you would do instead to convey this information. [[User:PikaSamus|PikaSamus]] ([[User talk:PikaSamus|talk]]) 20:25, 22 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
:Hi. Can you please respond to this message? I want to know your ideas so I can improve the template. [[User:PikaSamus|PikaSamus]] ([[User talk:PikaSamus|talk]]) 17:57, 29 October 2018 (UTC) | |||
::Hello? [[User:PikaSamus|PikaSamus]] ([[User talk:PikaSamus|talk]]) 18:07, 27 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
:::Sorry, that response back then was a bit of a knee-jerk reaction to having had my rhythm disrupted. Encountering multiple different formats for a single method of delivery can get confusing; it was bad enough when there were variations of the more widely-used method that both included and excluded epithets (and one unification was a tough enough task). I had hoped that I wouldn't have gotten an inquiry about that comment, I was hoping things would just simply blow over and the normal flow would not have been disrupted, but you just had to persist and turn it into a controversy I had hoped to avoid (I hope you'll consider the issue resolved)...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] ([[User talk:Shiningpikablu252|talk]]) 05:13, 30 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
== Warning == | |||
Working on a wiki is supposed to be a collaborative effort. And yet you are refusing to even acknowledge another user trying to reach out to you after you voiced your concerns about how a particular template is set up. If you think the template isn't the best way to display the information, why would you not explain why you feel that way? Other users will have different opinions on how pages should be set up; refusing to work with them to find the best solution is not the sort of behaviour we want here. | |||
You frankly have little place to criticise other users' work on Heroes articles or tell them to "do the research" when you appear to rely entirely on secondary sources for your info, instead of actually getting such info from the game itself. You don't need to look up gameplay videos to get enemy unit stats, for example, you literally just open up the game and look at the relevant maps yourself. Unless you're still using a Nokia 3310 or something, that can't be too difficult a task. | |||
Consider this an official warning for this and your other instances of condescending and insulting behaviour towards other editors (i.e. the insults in edit summaries as mentioned above). --[[User:Moydow|<span style="color: green;">Moy</span><span style="color: orange;">dow</span>]] ([[User talk:Moydow|Support]]) 04:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
:Uh, I do not, never have, and never will act condescending and insulting toward other users--that's not my nature, I am not rude or intimidating, never have been, never ever will. I personally feel insulted at any accusations implying otherwise, especially by wiring an "official warning" into such accusations (which I hope to have stricken from the record in due course); I promise that, as of October 10, 2010, that I will not do a single thing to appear to act condescending, insultive, rude or intimidating to any other users whatsoever, and I vow to uphold that promise for as long as it takes. --[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] ([[User talk:Shiningpikablu252|talk]]) 02:39, 1 December 2018 (UTC) | |||
