22,131
edits
| Site News |
|---|
| Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk! Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on Twitter (X) or Tumblr! |
Community:Ostia Square: Difference between revisions
From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.
→Spoiler content/templates/soft redirects
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 135: | Line 135: | ||
:::I personally am against #2. Both #1 and #3 are pretty reasonable, I'd readily go with #3 if it came to that, although that probably wouldn't stop me from using anti-spoiler redirects (i.e. [[Odin]], [[Laslow]], or what [[Black Knight (character)]] was before this situation arose) like I'd been doing in #1 before any mass relink projects were to start...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] ([[User talk:Shiningpikablu252|talk]]) 03:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC) | :::I personally am against #2. Both #1 and #3 are pretty reasonable, I'd readily go with #3 if it came to that, although that probably wouldn't stop me from using anti-spoiler redirects (i.e. [[Odin]], [[Laslow]], or what [[Black Knight (character)]] was before this situation arose) like I'd been doing in #1 before any mass relink projects were to start...--[[User:Shiningpikablu252|Shiningpikablu252]] ([[User talk:Shiningpikablu252|talk]]) 03:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC) | ||
:::I agree with 3 for the same reasoning; everything could be considered a spoiler, and our current use of the spoiler template is also inconsistent, yeah. I think getting rid of the template is a good idea. [[User:L95|L95]] ([[User talk:L95|talk]]) 03:28, 15 September 2017 (UTC) | |||
