Site News
Warning: This wiki contains spoilers. Read at your own risk!

Social media: If you would like, please join our Discord server, and/or follow us on Twitter (X) or Tumblr!

User talk:Shiningpikablu252: Difference between revisions

From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem information. By fans, for fans.
m (Let's just hope the second collection has 100% fewer controversies than the first one...)
m (Yeah, nice try, but you don't get away with just removing messages like that)
Line 1: Line 1:
:''Archives:  [[User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 1|1]]
:''Archives:  [[User talk:Shiningpikablu252/Archive 1|1]]
----
----
== Warning ==
Working on a wiki is supposed to be a collaborative effort. And yet you are refusing to even acknowledge another user trying to reach out to you after you voiced your concerns about how a particular template is set up. If you think the template isn't the best way to display the information, why would you not explain why you feel that way? Other users will have different opinions on how pages should be set up; refusing to work with them to find the best solution is not the sort of behaviour we want here.
You frankly have little place to criticise other users' work on Heroes articles or tell them to "do the research" when you appear to rely entirely on secondary sources for your info, instead of actually getting such info from the game itself. You don't need to look up gameplay videos to get enemy unit stats, for example, you literally just open up the game and look at the relevant maps yourself. Unless you're still using a Nokia 3310 or something, that can't be too difficult a task.
Consider this an official warning for this and your other instances of condescending and insulting behaviour towards other editors (i.e. the insults in edit summaries as mentioned above). --[[User:Moydow|<span style="color: green;">Moy</span><span style="color: orange;">dow</span>]] ([[User talk:Moydow|Support]]) 04:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:19, 30 November 2018

Archives: 1

Warning

Working on a wiki is supposed to be a collaborative effort. And yet you are refusing to even acknowledge another user trying to reach out to you after you voiced your concerns about how a particular template is set up. If you think the template isn't the best way to display the information, why would you not explain why you feel that way? Other users will have different opinions on how pages should be set up; refusing to work with them to find the best solution is not the sort of behaviour we want here.

You frankly have little place to criticise other users' work on Heroes articles or tell them to "do the research" when you appear to rely entirely on secondary sources for your info, instead of actually getting such info from the game itself. You don't need to look up gameplay videos to get enemy unit stats, for example, you literally just open up the game and look at the relevant maps yourself. Unless you're still using a Nokia 3310 or something, that can't be too difficult a task.

Consider this an official warning for this and your other instances of condescending and insulting behaviour towards other editors (i.e. the insults in edit summaries as mentioned above). --Moydow (Support) 04:36, 30 November 2018 (UTC)