Personal tools
Site News
Social media: Get in touch with Fire Emblem Wiki on Twitter, Facebook, or Discord! Or, to join our Skype chat, contact any active admin and ask to be added.

Coverage policy: Please read the proposed coverage policy, and contribute your thoughts and questions here.

Fire Emblem Wiki talk:Coverage policy

From Fire Emblem Wiki, your source on Fire Emblem Wiki information. By Fans, for Fans.
Revision as of 01:58, 1 February 2017 by BrandedOne (talk | contribs) (TearRing Saga/Berwick Saga)
Jump to: navigation, search

TearRing Saga/Berwick Saga

Does anyone have any opinions on whether or not we should include these games? It briefly came up here, but didn't generate enough discussion to go on. Notably, other Fire Emblem sites like Serenes Forest and the Fire Emblem Wikia cover them, owing to their connections to FE, so I feel it's worth discussing at the least. --Moydow (Support) 02:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

I have no issues with covering TRS and Berwick. I've played and am pretty familiar with TRS. Not so much Berwick, though, that'll change when the English translation is finished. Both should probably pretty low priority for now though. (...That is probably obvious) -L95 (talk) 03:02, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
I think these games fall within the scope of interest surrounding FE, as would the upcoming Vestaria Saga. It wouldn't be out of place to have at least some coverage of the games here, but as L95 said, it should take a backseat to pretty much everything else. Then again, if an editor feels compelled to work on them, I don't see why they should be stopped. BrandedOne (talk) 01:58, 1 February 2017 (UTC)